SCM

[#1187] flip bug?

Date:
2010-10-22 22:01
Priority:
4
State:
Open
Submitted by:
Yurii Aulchenko (yurii)
Assigned to:
Nobody (None)
Resolution:
Accepted As Bug
Operating System:
None
Severity:
major
Hardware:
None
Version:
None
Component:
MetABEL
URL:
Summary:
flip bug?

Detailed description
I have 4 data sets and in 3 of them the effective allele is C, and strand is -. In one of them the effallele is G and strand +. This C/- should correspond to G/+, right? At least the effective allele frequency is about the same. So the betas should be comparable as they are? In the metABEL results, however, the effallele is C, strand is -, and the beta of the fourth data set has been flipped into -0.20 (it was 0.20 before the meta-analysis)...? Am I misunderstanding something, or is there a bug in the metABEL?
I'm using Version: 0.0-3, Date: 2008-09-21

(The example data can be created in R using the attached script. I also included the output there.)

Many thanks,
Kati

Comments:

Message  ↓
Date: 2014-10-30 12:50
Sender: Lennart Karssen

See http://forum.genabel.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=904&p=1945#p1938 for a dirty workaround.

Attached Files:

Attachments:
Size Name Date By Download
4 KiBStrand_effallele_example.txt2010-10-22 22:01yuriiStrand_effallele_example.txt

Changes

Field Old Value Date By
ResolutionNone2011-01-28 07:21yurii
File Added73: Strand_effallele_example.txt2010-10-22 22:01yurii
Thanks to:
Vienna University of Economics and Business Powered By FusionForge