R Development Page

SciencePo log file (check_x86_64_linux)

Mon May  6 02:54:02 2013: Checking package SciencePo (SVN revision 18) ...
* using log directory ‘/mnt/building/build_2013-05-06-00-03/RF_PKG_CHECK/PKGS/SciencePo.Rcheck’
* using R version 3.0.0 Patched (2013-04-08 r62531)
* using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* checking for file ‘SciencePo/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
* checking extension type ... Package
* this is package ‘SciencePo’ version ‘0.3.3-01’
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Daniel Marcelino ’
New submission
Version contains leading zeroes (0.3.3-01)
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking whether package ‘SciencePo’ can be installed ... [3s/5s] OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... NOTE
prepare_Rd: accent.Rd:15-16: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: accent.Rd:25-26: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: anonymize.Rd:14: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: anonymize.Rd:23: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: anonymize.Rd:19: Dropping empty section \references
prepare_Rd: bhodrick93.Rd:25: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: cgreene76.Rd:22-23: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: cv.Rd:26-27: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: cv.Rd:22-23: Dropping empty section \references
prepare_Rd: cv.Rd:29-30: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: galton.Rd:27-28: Dropping empty section \source
prepare_Rd: get.ci.Rd:19-20: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: get.ci.Rd:28: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: get.ci.Rd:30: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: get.ipc.Rd:31: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: get.ipc.Rd:33: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: get.poly.Rd:13-14: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: get.poly.Rd:21: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: get.poly.Rd:23-24: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: griliches76.Rd:35-36: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: gsr.Rd:16: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: gsr.Rd:26: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: gsr.Rd:29-30: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: lsq.Rd:17-18: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: lsq.Rd:30: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: lsq.Rd:32: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: ltaylor96.Rd:18-19: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: mishkin92.Rd:22-23: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: nerlove63.Rd:19-20: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: outliers.Rd:16-17: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: outliers.Rd:25-26: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: outtags.Rd:15: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: outtags.Rd:21: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: rescale.Rd:16-17: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: rescale.Rd:24-25: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: rescale.Rd:20-21: Dropping empty section \references
prepare_Rd: rescale.Rd:28-29: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: se.Rd:33: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: sheston91.Rd:22-23: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: shift.Rd:18-19: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: shift.Rd:26: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: shift.Rd:28: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: skewness.Rd:35-36: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: soundexES.Rd:15-16: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: soundexFR.Rd:15-16: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: swatson93.Rd:19-21: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: tableau.Rd:15: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: tableau.Rd:25: Dropping empty section \note
prepare_Rd: tableau.Rd:27-28: Dropping empty section \seealso
prepare_Rd: tolatex.Rd:15-16: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: tolatex.Rd:28-29: Dropping empty section \seealso
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking contents of ‘data’ directory ... OK
* checking data for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... OK
* checking examples ... [2s/5s] OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK

NOTE: There were 2 notes.
See
  ‘/mnt/building/build_2013-05-06-00-03/RF_PKG_CHECK/PKGS/SciencePo.Rcheck/00check.log’
for details.

Run time: 79.92 seconds.